Subject: Beretta 390 vs. 391
Beretta 390 vs. 391
 RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391
RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391
RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391
RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391
RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391
RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391
RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391
RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391
RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391
RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391
RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391
RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391
RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391
RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391
RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391
RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391
RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391
RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391
RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391
RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391
| Subject: Beretta 390 vs. 391 |
Date: 05-02-2003 |
| Author: HiBrass |
Reply |
|
Hey, i was just wondering if i coud get some help. What is better theBeretta 390 or 391. Mabe a benelli. And also gas or inertia operated action. Thanks for any help. 
|
| Subject: RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391 |
Date: 05-02-2003 |
| Author: |
Reply |
|
He's baaack...
|
| Subject: RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391 |
Date: 05-02-2003 |
| Author: 12 gauge |
Reply |
|
I was told that the Berettta 390 is not so good but the 391 is really good. You could buy a Charles Daly for a lot less money and its really a ggood gun. Almost as good as a Browning. 12 ga all ya got to do is read the latest post on the Browning
|
| Subject: RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391 |
Date: 05-02-2003 |
| Author: Mike |
Reply |
|
I don't own one but I'm sure either will work good. Beretta isn't in the firearms market to rip people off.
|
| Subject: RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391 |
Date: 05-02-2003 |
| Author: Shotgunner |
Reply |
|
I think the Bennelli is a great gun its fast and light and its a good gun even if its recoil operated.
|
| Subject: RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391 |
Date: 05-02-2003 |
| Author: Mike |
Reply |
|
Now recomending a charles daly over a browning or beretta is stupid you have no hard facts that the CD will last longer they have only been in production for 10 years. I have a Browning A-5 from the 1930's it works fine never once been repaired. There are hundreds of bad things said about CD's. I don't hear bad things about brownings and berettas anywhere near that of CD complants.
|
| Subject: RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391 |
Date: 05-02-2003 |
| Author: Matt |
Reply |
|
The Beretta 390, 391, Benelli, and the Browning are fantastic top of the line semi autos, you can't go wrong with any of them. The CD is a cheap semi auto that is not even comparable to the above. Whoever said that "the 390 wasn't so good" is spewing garbage and has no credibility. The gas operated gun(Beretta, Browning Gold) will have less recoil, and the recoil operated gun (Benelli, Browning A5) will be easier to keep clean. I don't know if you can say which one is better, it's more a matter of personal preference.
|
| Subject: RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391 |
Date: 05-03-2003 |
| Author: 12 gauge |
Reply |
|
Ya but for the money the c/d is the best gun out there ask anyone!!!
|
| Subject: RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391 |
Date: 05-04-2003 |
| Author: john305 |
Reply |
|
No the CD is the BIGGEST waste of money out there. HUGE difference, The best Low cost auto I have yet to see would be teh Baikal mp153 3.5".
The Beretta AL 390 and AL391 are both great guns for sporting use. It seems they have The biggest fan base for semi autos. The A390 at wally world is also a good shotgun but lacks a few of the goodies that their normal line up has. But then it is also in the $550 range and that is a great price.
|
| Subject: RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391 |
Date: 05-04-2003 |
| Author: 12 gauge |
Reply |
|
I had a C/D and I hit 2 cases of skeet without missing a single shot . Its a great gun
|
| Subject: RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391 |
Date: 05-04-2003 |
| Author: HiBrass |
Reply |
|
shut up 12gauge. I want information from people who know what they are talking about. Thanks to everyone else!
|
| Subject: RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391 |
Date: 05-04-2003 |
| Author: Mike |
Reply |
|
Hibrass buy any beretta don't own one but I'm sure they will work good for a long time.
|
| Subject: RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391 |
Date: 05-04-2003 |
| Author: |
Reply |
|
Browning is much easier to keep clean
|
| Subject: RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391 |
Date: 05-04-2003 |
| Author: Ruger |
Reply |
|
12 gauge do you own a CD? If so what model? What gauge and what kind of shells have you used? How many have you shot through it?
|
| Subject: RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391 |
Date: 05-05-2003 |
| Author: Kent |
Reply |
|
2 cases of skeet????????
|
| Subject: RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391 |
Date: 05-05-2003 |
| Author: Bill |
Reply |
|
The Charels Daly is Being retured at Warp speed at Wally's, They wont tell you if you ask them, but if you can catch a sales person in a candid moment they'll spill the beans. Just like the old man says,"you get what you pay for". The 390's major problem was the reciever shape, as most of we Yank's seem to like rounded recievers. I'm sure that the 391 is a good gun, as most Beretta's are, but as with cars they all make a lemon once in a while. I always wait about three years on the new ones, and let them get the bugs out.
|
| Subject: RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391 |
Date: 03-23-2004 |
| Author: jmbauer |
Reply |
|
I agree. I own a Silver Mallard. A great gun. I shoot trap. I have a 30inch barell 12ga. Who ever said that it is bad is wrong. it is a light gun, easy swing, reliable. Comes with a medium rib. I highly recomend this gun. I have shot the Urika a lot of times. I would not recommend for those of u who shoot trap. Too light and swings too easy. The 390 Silver mallard is not as easy cleaning as a browning..yes but, my preference was the 390. I shoot trap with Imp. Mod. #8 shot 2 3/4 dram. Great until the 23 yrd line, then ya use 7 1/2
|
| Subject: RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391 |
Date: 03-23-2004 |
| Author: wayne-w |
Reply |
|
I traded my 390A on my 391 I wish I had the 390A. I just shot better with it.
|
| Subject: RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391 |
Date: 03-24-2004 |
| Author: 682bear |
Reply |
|
The 390 and 391 are both extremely good guns, with the 391 probably being favored by most people. Stay away from Charles Daly shotguns (I have personally seen several break after just a few boxes of shells were fired through it). Also, stay away from Benellis. They are very good guns, but they kick like a mule, and if you ever want to shoot lighter loads (such as a AA featherweight) the Benelli will give problems cycling. They also aren't balanced well for clays (for most shooters). Good luck! -bear
|
| Subject: RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391 |
Date: 03-24-2004 |
| Author: jmbauer |
Reply |
|
Yes wayne, i said, some people like me prefer a shotgun that is not too light. That includes a long barrel. That way you dont jerk a lot or have an execive swing. Did you have a Silver Mallard? It is a very nice gun. Good Luck! jm
|
| Subject: RE: Beretta 390 vs. 391 |
Date: 04-24-2004 |
| Author: madonna smorel |
Reply |
|
I'm here to tell you that the beretta 390 is GREAT! Switched from Citori O/U to the Beretta 390 and I LOVE it! Bennelli?
|
|
