Sporting Clays
 Home
 Features
 Departments
 Pro Shop
 Quick Shots
 Sporting Emporium
 Archives
 Contact Us
 Classified Ads
 FAQs
 Forums
 Catalog Resource Guide


 NSCA News
 NSCA Directory
 Headlines from Headquarters
 Club Profiles
 Ranges & Tournaments
 Instructors/Schools
 Tournament Results

Advanced Search



Subject: Shotshell reloader purchase advice


Shotshell reloader purchase advice
    RE: Shotshell reloader purchase advice
    RE: Shotshell reloader purchase advice
    RE: Shotshell reloader purchase advice
        RE: Shotshell reloader purchase advice
Subject: Shotshell reloader purchase advice Date: 03-09-2004
Author: WDC Reply
I am considering purchasing a second hand shotshell reloader. I would like a progressive reloader and have found two units in good condition although I know nothing about ether or which is a better make. The units are a 12 gauge Pacific (Hornady) model 366 and a Ponsness-Warren 800B Shotshell Reloader. Both units progressive and both in very good condition. The Warren is about twice the cost but still under $325 and it looks a bit more industrial although I know nothing about the advantages and disadvantages of ether make. Would someone with knowledge of these units please offer some advice.

Regards, WDC

Top of thread


Subject: RE: Shotshell reloader purchase advice Date: 03-10-2004
Author: bowyer Reply
WDC I think that if you can buy a Ponsnes-Warren for under $325.00, go for it. Unless it a bag of bolts. That's one of the best, and it's strong, hench the industrial look. I paid that much for my Mec 9000G and it's not the loader that that is.

Top of thread


Subject: RE: Shotshell reloader purchase advice Date: 03-22-2004
Author: milo Reply
I have a 366 and love it ,I have loaded 12-16 a minute once you get going but I would say 10 is a fair estimate without restocking time and being careful. If you get the 366 take the brass tube for priners and grind a notch in it near the bottom so you know when you are low. This will save many aw sht's when you run out and powder hits the bench. Also you cannot remove a shell if there is a problem crimp or jam, must cycle through and start over. Another thing with the 366 is resizing is optional and another step, I don't resize for my o/u and it is smoother easier pull and not nessecary for me, if you shoot auto this could be a prob. With all the pros and cons I still like the 366. With the price of lead estimated at $22 next year we will all be buying factory shells soon anyway, ha,..

Top of thread


Subject: RE: Shotshell reloader purchase advice Date: 03-24-2004
Author: jr Reply
I have the new version of the PW 800, and it is a terrific machine. The loads are incredibly consistent. The nice thing about the current version is the removable shell holders. You can check your powder or shot charges periodically or remove the full if something goes wrong (unless you try to get one too many reloads from a hull, that probably won't happen). That was my only complain with the original 800. Also, if you like to experiment with different loads a lot, it is difficult because you can't remove a shell in the middle of the operation. However, once you get it set up, it is terrific. I have reloaded on the Hornaday, and it is a very good machine, but I don't care for the primer system.

Good luck.

Top of thread


Subject: RE: Shotshell reloader purchase advice Date: 04-28-2004
Author: hondaman Reply
Without a doubt, the PW is the machine to go with Ponsness/Warren is THE machine to have..........

Top of thread


SUBSCRIBE NOW!
August Issue Now On Sale!
DEPARTMENTS

  Shotgun Review Index

  Shotguns

  Wingshooting

  Ballistics

  Conservation

  Sporting Road

  Editors Notes


Featured Catalog

Gamaliel


Home | Features | Departments | Quick Shots | Sporting Emporium | Contact Us | Forums
Headlines from Headquarters | Club Profiles | Ranges & Tournaments | Instuctors/Schools | Tournament Results

Copyright ©1996-2009, Sporting Clays, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Contents may not be reprinted or otherwise reproduced without written permission of publisher.